Showing posts with label Religion. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Religion. Show all posts

Friday, March 28, 2014

Sovereign or

sovereignTy are not in the constitution.


3-31-14 Monday morning

WMD.  Word Magic Desomething.
OK, I wove in the sovereignTea issue over the weekend, in reference to a Papal Fracas over markets and autonomy(FB). Night of the Living Dead was broadcast as well.

FNL:(Unacronimbole Player)
Keynesian Economics
Keynes...ianism
'n Theory
4th /  Dimention[?? [!]

Speaking of Sham bling on.  E(...)pic!
Ineffable.

Thursday, September 13, 2012

Refrain Post Frain?

It seems to come almost naturally to some***.  You might ask, what?  I won't go there, nor refrain.
Tan Gent not implied*, but it is a bit like a satire of a mockery
So here are some unread links to file for later.
Dangerous Narratives
Whose Maker
Obama Role
The Bounce?

* anachronism intended

Footnotes** Change

** click Footnotes for details

*** exception to the rule(bottom line) [Footnotes** Change] appropriately
i.e. yet to footnote but what the google[anachronism unintended] or is it?
[Not so RawMoney.]
[Ed Word]

[fn] Re:**

Friday, August 31, 2012

More Money?

They say G*d works in mysterious ways. 
Aside from who "they" are, does he hide in plane* sight?

Now I will un-rove bUy burying some ledes.
I have already headed off a punch line.

Speaking of (GPS)... is it ad lib or un add con? (or unicorn?)

*"plane" asterisk
*plain pun
Try Knitty?

[Not to be snarky, but MOReMONey?]

Tuesday, April 24, 2012

The State of Religion?

Catholicism* just not laissez faire capitalism.
Should we catholicize the capitalism?


*not just to capitalize on the flip-flop of the underlying links, but I would not capitalize the catholicism.

[SubtextDualism]

Monday, March 05, 2012

Co-Wink-E-Dink?

Or Key Dink?

It was Friday night and I just happened flip the channel and stumbled upon the Prophecies of Kim Clement. (links obviously not from then)

'Nuff said, but later I looked up* the word "prophesy" (no concordance) But the spooky thing is that as I popped open this book of over 1300 pages and it opened right to the word "prophecy".**

Another interesting intersect.
Bottom-line my hard copy is not available online so I might say that it is a cross*** between "online" and muse-ic. "To be called"-"in the spirit".

*Vine, White, Unger (Expository)
**(Ctrl F - prophecy)
*** Summit in May?
[President Obama at some point has noted an upcoming Middle East summit or conference, which I believe was penciled in for May, if I recall. I feel that it is just one more plank in his platform for progress: education, health, energy and diplomacy.]
[Follow up of sorts.]
[It is with mis-givings that there is no"key dink" here (or above), but there is more to sort("of sorts") in the last link.(previous bracketed & "_ _" 's.)]

Wednesday, May 18, 2011

Technical Difficulties

Anomalies or Synchronicities? By definition they are hard to explain. But there was first the missing link that I referenced here and then the Eli Pariser "bubble" context. Then there is the Wrap(5***) problem* and follow up **.

* in context is biased
** also needs follow-up and labels
*** anomoly (2) / anomaly(1) (W itch Are)
[then there is the Al Gore Rhythm Spell Check problem, and follow ups.]
(note: numbers in (brackets) are links as found in search to check any change in the algorithms C-W r a p(5).)
Note: Psychology Label added, Physics and Philosophy already applied(6), not necessarily used well.
[By Jove I may have it.]
[Speaking of hunches Gingrich may be wit Mitt. He may be making Mitt and others look good, and working the churned media for his own Obamanation.]

Thursday, May 19th, 2011
Technical difficulties is no pun on Speaker Boehner calling the government broke or Ed Schultz calling it broken. Or was it? Given the anomalies and synchronicity theories who knows? But it was about looking at my own modus operandi and then blogspot having its difficulties and Eli Pariser's TED Talk on the Internet. The word follow-up(4) may have popped up and is applicable(2 to insert here).

Friday, May 20th, 2011
Speaking of difficulties, I had to correct yesterday being Friday. I guess I get a second shot. Note Psychology Label added for reasons then above and follow up, references "rational expectations" not to mention talk and guts. (Bush v. Lakoff) Speaking of talk, yesterday's inserts (2 became 3) are economic talks(YouTube) from INETeconomics.org. And a reminder that problem* above is a Koch Brothers spin. And note to self** is still pending* while I might return to Risk and Robustness.

Since it is Friday and I have several posts in draft that relate to this link, I might note that this is still under construction if I ever get back to it. But in this regard I will say that this is the first INET link I watched and have found several others I might recommend that have been imbedded above but will simple list here:
Raghuram Rajan: Delineating the Role of Government
Also see prior ** not fully read yet but gives context right off the bat***
Lance Taylor: Maynard's Revenge
Reforming the Macroeconomic Framework: Sushil Wadhwani
IMF Calls for New Economic Thinking: Or Does It?

Keynes in a box? I will not expound upon this academic pun except to note the room and a flip-flop. i.e. what I took from Huntington and what Fukuyama may have learned or changed.

*scroll or click but nfry = not fully read yet
**Why I am not an Austrian Economist
*** see can(under bat)

[Not So Frackin' Funny: Demand a...side. (or Borg)Not Pop'nCulture]